Different Leadership Styles
Different blogspot.com//search?q=managerial-leadership-leader-qualities">leadership styles or types of leaders are listed together with explained below.
Image Credits © Fitness 360.
The diverse styles of leadership are equally follows:
- Autocratic Style,
- Consultative Style,
- Participative Style,
- Laissez-Faire Style
- Bureaucratic Leader,
- Neurocratic Leader,
- Paternalistic Style,
- Sociocratic Style, and
- Situational Style.
Types of Leaders
Above leadership styles or dissimilar types of leaders are discussed below.
Type 1. Autocratic Style
Autocratic type of leader is called an Autocrat. He does non consult his subordinates (followers). He takes all the decisions yesteryear himself. He too takes total responsibleness for his decisions. The subordinates must obey him without yell for whatever questions.
Type 2. Consultative Style
Consultative type of leader has an opened upwardly mind. He encourages his subordinates to give their suggestions together with comments. If these suggestions together with comments are good, thence he volition induce got them. So this leader consults his subordinates earlier taking a decision. However, the lastly determination is taken yesteryear the leader. Therefore, he takes total responsibleness for his decision.
Type 3. Participative Style
Participative type of leader encourages his subordinates to convey purpose inwards blogspot.com//search?q=managerial-leadership-leader-qualities">decision making. The lastly determination is non taken yesteryear the leader himself. It is taken yesteryear the grouping (team), i.e. yesteryear the leader together with his subordinates. The leader gives his subordinates total ambit for using their talents. He is loyal to them. Therefore, they are loyal to him. They obey his orders willingly. They induce got a genuine (real) abide by for him.
Type 4. Laissez-Faire Style
Laissez-Faire mode of leader is passive. He only acts equally a contact man. He provides data together with resources to his subordinates. He believes that the subordinates volition run best if they are left alone. Therefore, he gives them consummate liberty to convey their ain decisions. He allows them to excogitation together with organise their ain work. He allows them to railroad train their ain goals together with to solve problems on their own.
Type 5. Bureaucratic Leader
Bureaucratic leader follows all the rules together with formalities of the blogspot.com//search?q=managerial-leadership-leader-qualities">organisation. He does non believe inwards novel ideas. He wants his subordinates to follow all his orders. This leadership mode effect inwards cherry-red tapism together with unwanted newspaper work.
Type 6. Neurocratic Leader
Neurocratic leader is highly a chore oriented one. He wants to larn the run done at whatever cost. He gets real upset if in that place is whatever failure. He is real emotional, sensitive together with eccentric. He does non consult his subordinates inwards determination making. He takes his ain decisions.
Type 7. Paternalistic Style
Paternalistic mode of a leader creates a menage unit of measurement atmosphere inwards the organisation. He acts simply similar a bring upwardly of his subordinates. He advises, guides together with helps his subordinates amongst their personal problems. This mode of leadership volition live successful inwards a pocket-size scheme having a real few employees together with only i leader.
Type 8. Sociocratic Style
The sociocratic leader tries to run the scheme simply similar a Social Club. He gives less importance to production together with to a greater extent than importance to friendship. That is, he tries to larn out on his subordinates real happy. So, he creates a warm together with adept social environment.
Type 9. Situational Style
Situational type of leader uses dissimilar styles inwards dissimilar situations. That is, he changes his mode according to the situation. Sometimes he volition live autocratic, or consultative, or participative, etc. Now-a-days, nearly managers usage this mode of leadership.
Comments