Comparison - H.O Theory Vs Ricardian Theory ↓
The payoff or superiority of Ohlin's Modern Theory over the Ricardian Classical Theory of international merchandise gets highlighted from the next of import points of comparison.
1. No departure amidst internal in addition to international trade
According to the Classical economists, in that place is a involve for a split theory of international merchandise because of the differences betwixt internal in addition to international trade.
But according to Ohlin, in that place is no involve for a split theory of international trade, as key regulation of both is same.
2. More variables
As against Ricardian Theory which is based on 2 countries, 2 commodities in addition to ane factor, Ohlin's Modern theory incorporates 2 countries 2 commodities in addition to 2 factors.
3. Comparative cost theory
According to the classical theory, the regulation of comparative costs is a particular characteristic of international trade.
According to Ohlin, the regulation of comparative cost is applicable to all trade; whether internal or international.
4. Cost departure is expressed inwards terms of money
Superiority of H.O. theory lies inwards the fact that it calculates the cost differences inwards terms of money. Ricardo explains the departure inwards terms of labour theory of value of which is amount of defects in addition to impracticable. Trade which involves telephone substitution of goods in addition to services has been carried inwards terms of money. H.O. theory renders the motility of the merchandise tardily to understand.
5. Supply of factors of production considered
The principal motility of the international merchandise is the departure inwards element supplies betwixt the countries. Each dry reason differs inwards element endowments i.e. inwards their abundance or scarcity. Difference inwards supply, given the demand, brings the departure inwards cost of element in addition to finally, the departure inwards commodity prices. In Ricardian theory, departure inwards element (labour) efficiency is recognized simply departure inwards element render is ignored. H.O. theory, so provides a ameliorate explanation of cost departure of factors through the departure is their supplies.
6. Contribution to positive economies
Ricardian theory which no doubtfulness explains the argue for internal merchandise is to a greater extent than concerned amongst the benefits of trade. For classical economists, the welfare human face of merchandise is to a greater extent than important. Ohlin has adapted a positive approach inwards explaining the motility of international trade. His principal work organisation was to honor out the motility of merchandise in addition to non then much of its welfare aspect. Therefore, it is pointed out that Ohlin's analysis has contributed to positive economical analysis.
Briefly Compare - Ricardian Theory Vs HO Theory ↓
Conclusion - Ohlin's Theory Vs Ricardian Theory ↓
In the classical analysis, departure inwards the cost ratios betwixt countries are due to the departure inwards the science in addition to efficiency of labour. It implies that in that place volition last no merchandise inwards hereafter if the 2 countries accept mastered each other's technique in addition to labour becomes every bit efficient inwards both.
But Ohlin's theory asserts that merchandise volition never halt fifty-fifty if noesis travels freely betwixt the countries in addition to the best techniques of production are ever known to both countries. This is because, the modern theory states that the relative differences inwards element endowments are the relative causes for the differences inwards the prices of commodities.
Thus the modern theory is an improvement over the classical theory.
Comments