1. Douglas McGregor's - Theory of Motivation
The eminent psychologist Douglas McGregor has given his theory of motivation called Theory X in addition to Theory Y. He outset presented his theory inward a classic article titled 'The Human Side of Enterprise'. He treated traditional approach to management equally 'Theory X' in addition to the professional person approach to management equally 'Theory Y'. His theory refers to 2 sets of employees based on the perception of human nature. Here, theory X in addition to theory Y are 2 sets of assumptions virtually the nature of employees. His theory is based on human behavior.
2. Theory X.
Theory X is based on traditional assumptions virtually people (employees). Here, the conventional approach of management is used equally a base. It suggests the next features of an average human being/employee (assumptions virtually human nature):
2.1 Assumptions of Theory X.
- The average human beingness is inherently lazy yesteryear nature in addition to desires to operate equally petty equally possible. He dislikes the operate in addition to volition similar to avoid it, if he can.
- He avoids accepting responsibleness in addition to prefers to last led or directed yesteryear to a greater extent than or less other.
- He is self-centered in addition to indifferent to organizational needs.
- He has petty ambition, dislikes responsibility, prefers to last led but wants security.
- He is non real intelligent in addition to lacks inventiveness inward solving organizational problems.
- He yesteryear nature resists to modify of whatsoever type.
In the illustration of such employees, self-motivation is only non possible. They volition operate solely when in that place is constant supervision on them. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 director has to persuade, punish or vantage such workers inward companionship to orbit organizational goals.
3. Theory Y.
Theory Y is based on modern or progressive or professional person approach. Here, the assumptions virtually people i.e. employees are quite different.
3.1 Assumptions of Theory Y.
- Work is equally natural equally play, provided the operate environs is favorable. Work may deed equally a origin of satisfaction or punishment. An average human is non actually against doing work.
- People tin flame last self-directed in addition to creative at operate if they are motivated properly.
- Self-control on the business office of people is useful for achieving organizational goal. External command in addition to threats of penalty lonely produce non pick out out efforts towards organizational objectives.
- People create got capacity to do imagination in addition to creativity.
- People are non yesteryear nature passive or resistant to organizational needs. They create got acquire in addition to thus equally a number of sense inward organisations.
- An average human beingness learns nether proper conditions. He is also willing to pick out responsibility.
- The intellectual capacity of an average human beingness is utilised partially nether the atmospheric condition of modern industrial life.
4. Final Glance On Theory X in addition to Theory Y.
Such types of people (employees) are self-motivated in addition to McGregor recommends that they last motivated yesteryear encouraging participation in addition to thus equally to acquire squad work. Theory Y assumes that people are non yesteryear nature, lazy in addition to unreliable. They tin flame last self-directed in addition to creative at work, if properly motivated. It is for the management to unleash this potential inward individuals (employees). Theory Y emphasizes creating opportunities, removing obstacles, providing guidance in addition to encouraging growth. By using these tools, the management tin flame integrate private goals of employees amongst those of the Organisation.
The assumptions inward Theory X in addition to Theory Y are fundamentally distinct. Theory X is static, rigid, conservative in addition to pessimistic. Theory Y is optimistic, dynamic, flexible in addition to progressive. It suggests self management in addition to the integration of private needs amongst organizational needs. On the other hand, to a greater extent than importance is given to external command imposed yesteryear the superior on the subordinate inward the Theory X.
Comments